|
| |
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
STATE OF HAWAII
STATE CAPITOL HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813
INDUSTRIAL HEMP [CANNABIS SATIVA]-ECONOMIC VIABILITY AND
POLITICAL CONCERNS
REDISCOVERING INDUSTRIAL HEMP
Countries, such as France, Spain. China. India. Korea and satellite nations of
the former Soviet Union have been cultivating industrial hemp for years. A 1961
United Nations Single Convention Treaty specifically allows cultivation of
cannabis for industrial purposes. and the more recent NAFTA and GATT
international trade agreements recognize hemp as a valid agricultural crop.
These international agreements form the basis for reintroducing industrial hemp
today.
Some Western countries that had earlier followed the U.S. in banning industrial
hemp, have recently changed their legislation.
Canada granted its first public research permit for industrial hemp cultivation
in 1994. In 1995 it granted 12 permits, including one for seed production and
two for research test plots maintained by the government agricultural
departments.
Australia has also begun growing low-THC hemp on an experimental basis. Field
trials are being conducted in Tasmania and South Australia, and a two-year study
is under way at the University of Tasmania to see whether hemp cultivation would
be viable under local conditions. Two major paper companies are conducting their
own laboratory pulping trials using materials from the experimental fields with
a view to utilizing hemp as a strengthening supplement to wood and straw based
paper.
In Great Britain commercial hemp cultivation, though still on a small scale, is
under way. Under licenses from the UK Home Office 2000 acres were grown in 1994,
up from 1500 acres in 1993. Since the first British hemp was woven into cloth in
1995, English hemp growers have been looking forward to supplying the two
biggest markets for ecological products in the world--the U.S. and Germany--both
of which had maintained their ban on industrial hemp. England's advantageous
position started eroding, however, when Germany legalized hemp cultivation in
late 1995.
Before the publication of the 1993 bestseller, The Rediscovery of the
Resource Hemp Cannabis Marihuana [Herer, Broeckers, KATALYSE] there had been
little visible interest in hemp in Germany. However, since then a strong hemp
lobby has emerged, consisting of Germany's principal farmers' association,
representatives from the textile and printing industry, and environmental
groups. While these groups set the stage, the legislative changes came about
through party and local government initiatives.
Four US states introduced industrial hemp bills in their 1996 legislatures:
Hawaii, Vermont, Colorado, and Missouri. Hawaii's bills were held in committee.
Colorado's bill [SB 67] passed the Senate but was defeated in the House.
Vermont's bill [H783] passed the House and is on its way to the Senate. In
Missouri the Hemp Production Act of 1996 [972] was heard, but not voted on, in
the Agricultural Committee.
Also in the U.S., an executive order [June 3, 1994. No. 12919] signed by
President Clinton included hemp as a strategic food resource. The Commissioner
of Agriculture for the State of Kentucky, Ed Logsdon, announced in 1994 that
"it's time to look at producing hemp on a commercial basis." Outside
of legislative chambers, hemp supporters have formed a multitude of special
interest organizations. One of the newest and largest creations is the North
American Industrial Hemp Council [October 1995]. A parallel organization, the
Canadian Hemp Council, was formed in Canada [February 1996] Why this recent
commotion about industrial hemp? The initiatives are driven by economic and
environmental visions of a flourishing hemp industry in the future. The growing
world population requires an increasing supply of resources. Deforestation has
been depleting the planet's timber supply while the demand for paper skyrockets.
Unlike trees, industrial hemp produces two important resources from a single
plant--cellulose and seed oil--so it can be used to make high quality paper or
cloth. Compounding its benefits is the short growing cycle for hemp: four months
compared to at least seven years for pulp trees.
VERSATILITY AND ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP
Industrial hemp produces three main raw materials: bast fiber, hurds, and seeds.
Using these three ingredients in different manners make industrial hemp a
versatile product. Moreover, all hemp-based products, including plastics, are
biodegradable.
Construction Materials
[e.g. paneling, fiberboard, cement blocks. insulation material]: According to
Dave Seber. former president of C&S, a research and development company
exploring fibroid alternatives, the future importance of hemp will probably not
lie in the areas that hemp has traditionally been associated with, e.g.
textiles, but rather in "composites," such as medium density boards
and cement-like materials.
Russia, Poland and other Eastern European countries already manufacture
composite boards from hemp and other plant materials. In the U.S., researchers
at the Washington State Wood Composite Laboratory are working on further
refining the technology for hempbased medium density fiberboards. In fact, some
of the first Canadian hemp crop was contracted to produce samples of such
boards. Though of excellent quality, the boards are not yet economical and their
future profitability depends on the price of woodchips. which have been
fluctuating greatly over the last year. Hemp hurds, alone or blended with wood.
can be used in existing mills without major changes in equipment.
Paper
In 1916 the USDA reported that hemp hurds could produce four times as much paper
per acre as trees. With increased yields and improved technology this may now be
higher. In addition, hemp paper is stronger. can be recycled more often, and
lasts longer than tree paper.
Currently, all hemp paper sold in the US is manufactured abroad and must be
imported, resulting in prices that are 2-3 times higher than tree paper.
Kimberly Clarke, an American Fortune 500 company which manufactures hemp paper
for cigarettes and Bibles in France, sells much of their cigarette paper to
American companies. Tree Free EcoPaper of Oregon imports paper manufactured in
China. The company is in the process of building a paper mill in Oregon that
would create 400 new jobs, but without a domestic hemp supply, raw materials
will have to be imported, keeping prices high. Germany's largest paper
manufacturer has recently converted two mills for hemp-based paper production.
Small specialty mills can convert to hemp without too much difficulty and
expense, but large scale paper mills would need to retool 40-60% of their
equipment.
Textiles
[e.g. diapers, denim, shoes, fine textiles]: As one of the strongest natural
fibers available, hemp is an excellent raw material for making various kinds of
rope and twine. It is also used to make a wide range of textile products from
fine linens to coarse canvas. [Incidentally, the word canvas is derived from
cannabis.]
Given currently available technology, production costs for hemp textiles,
relative to other fibers, are still high. Bast fibers, such as hemp, tend to
have high production because they make up only a certain portion of the plant
system and must be separated from the rest of the stem before they can be used
in textile or paper production. Besides being labor intensive. the processing of
hemp is also hard on existing baling equipment, as it will tend to wrap around
the cylinder.
There is, however, a growing market for hemp fabric. Several companies in the US
produce textile products from imported hemp fabric. Wait Disney Co. carries hemp
products. Esprit will soon begin offering hemp clothes as part of its
collection. Fashion designer Calvin Klein has announced plans to use hemp in his
clothing lines. Deja Shoe, a company that produces footwear from recycables and
earth-friendly materials, will soon be offering hemp shoes, and 100% hemp
Converse All Stars are already available. Adidas, Vans and other shoemakers are
either marketing hemp-topped sneakers or planning to do so.
Plastics
32-38% of hemp hurds and 53-74% of hemp bark is made up of cellulose, the basic
building block of plastics. Until the 1930s hemp-based cellophane, celluloid and
other products were common, and Henry Ford used hemp to make car doors and
fenders. Today hemp hurds can be used to make new plastic or blended into
recycled plastic.
Food Products
Hemp seeds are 20-25% protein. They can be used-to make non-dairy cheese, milk,
ice cream, and hemp butter. Food products made out of hemp seed are high in
calcium, magnesium, phosphorous, potassium, and Vitamin A.
Hemp seeds can also be pressed for their oil. Hemp seed oil is a rich source of
cholesterol fighting essential fatty acids (EFA). U.S. law allows imports of
sterilized hemp seeds, but such importation greatly increases production costs
while the sterilization process harms the nutritional value of the seeds and
hastens rancidity. Hemp seeds are also commonly used in birdseed and as feed for
domesticated animals.
Personal Hygiene
[soap, lip balm. cosmetics]: Hemp oil's high EFA content makes it a suitable
ingredient for cosmetics. Most moisturizing products that are on the market
today are made from saturated oils which are not absorbed by the skin cells, but
only coat the surface to prevent further moisture loss. In contrast, lotions
that are high in EFA's can be absorbed into the cells.
Paints and Varnishes
Until the 1930's, most paints were made from hemp and linseed oils. Beyond
coating the surface, hemp oil soaks into wood and preserves it.
High quality absorbents
Hemp products are excellent absorbents used in horse stables, cat litter, or oil
cleanups. They are more absorbent than wood shavings and compost faster.
Other Products
Seed oil can be combined with 15% methanol to create a substitute for diesel
fuel which burns 70% cleaner than petroleum diesel. It is also a good base for
non-toxic printing inks. While such inks are currently made from soybeans, hemp
is higher in linoleic acids, which means it requires less processing and is a
superior drying oil. Hemp seed oil also makes a good all purpose lubricant.
Cargill manufactures a line of 100% plant-based plastic silverware. Plant-based
plastics, such as shopping bags, are biodegradable and can be composted at home.
In Germany an 100% hemp oil-based laundry detergent is about to go into
production. The detergent's advantages include environmentally friendly
production and high biodegradability. It can also be made into an industrial
cleaner that removes oil and tar from textiles.
POTENTIAL VS. REALITY
Could industrial hemp [if its cultivation is legalized] lead to a thriving
industry, creating employment and profits? Theoretical potential and economic
realities are two different things. So far, legal constraints have prevented
industrial hemp from being grown on a large scale in most developed nations, so
that there has been little incentive to develop new technology that would
maximize hemp's profitability.
Community Development
The bottom line of growing hemp is the cost of transportation to a processing
center. Since hemp is a bulky crop, it is not cost-effective to ship hemp far
for processing. In terms of economies of scale this would appear to be a
disadvantage. However. in terms of community economic development, hemp's
bulkiness means that, if successful, hemp cultivation will lead to local
processing centers and jobs in small weaving factories or seed crushing
facilities, and pulp mills. Hemp holds the promise to revitalize certain
agricultural communities.
Research & Development
Technology to turn hemp into usable fiber and fiber into desired products is
available and new technological developments are under way. Silsoe College in
Bedforshire, Great Britain, for example, has developed a machine comparable to
the cotton gin machine, which over two hundred years ago helped reduce the price
of cotton a hundred fold. This "decorticator," which is able to
extract fiber from the stems of crops such as hemp and flax cheaply, is now
undergoing commercial trials. In Belgium a "scutching" machine
normally used to extract linen-grade fibers from flax, can also extract fiber
from hemp.
The primary focus in hemp technology has been on fiber processing. Work coming
out of German flax programs is now being applied to hemp, leading to processes
which include a steam explosion/cottonization process to produce cotton-like
short fiber. Further technological modifications or innovations will be needed
for full-scale processing of hemp.
Some researchers in U.S. Department of Energy laboratories are studying
microorganisms that will detach crude cellulosic fibers from lignin, the natural
glue which holds plants together. The results could be applicable to hemp by
making a larger part of the plant usable as biomass for energy production.
Seed
More research needs to be done to create strains of hemp that are low in THC,
high in fiber and productivity and suited to specific growing conditions.
Advances made in one geographic location are not necessarily optimal elsewhere.
In the past, France has been the leader in breeding a low-THC industrial hemp
seed that is suited to Europe's cool climate. New, non-French low-THC hemp seed
stock is under development in Europe and is expected to be certified by the EEC
in the near future.
Comparison with Other Crops
Industrial hemp has often been compared with other crops to show its high
profitability. As mentioned above, a 1916 Department of Agriculture report found
that an acre of industrial hemp produced four times as much dry fiber as an acre
of trees.
Other comparisons can be made, but an equally valid, perhaps even better
approach of looking at hemp is one of scaling down expectations and looking at
the minimum benefit. This is what Joe Hickey, head of the Kentucky Hemp Growers
Cooperative, does when talking to his farmers. He reminds them what they will
gain from growing hemp, even if hemp does not make a penny more than a good crop
of hay. Hemp is a good rotational crop which stabilizes and enriches the soil,
while keeping the field weed-free for the next planting without the costs of
herbicides. This is value added, which hay does not provide. According to this
view, anything beyond that value, such as profits from a small decorticator or
seed crushing facility, would be an extra benefit to the community.
GROWING CONDITIONS OF HEMP
Hemp is an annual herbaceous plant that can grow to heights of 5-20 ft. during a
3-4 month growing cycle. The plant's rapid growth suppresses weeds and
eliminates the need for herbicides, while its relative insensitivity to insects
and fungal diseases allows hemp farmers to forego the use of pesticides and
insecticides.
Hemp cultivation requires good soil conditions and sufficient supplies of
nitrogen and water, especially during the first six weeks. During the early
growth period it also requires fertilizer. Later in the growing cycle nutrients
are returned to the soil by falling leaves.
Male and female flowers are borne on different plants, though modern breeding in
Europe has produced "monoecious" [male and female flowers on the same
plant] varieties. Selecting monoecious strains overcomes the problem of
different maturation times between male and female plants and results in stalks
of more uniform height and weight.
After harvesting, the crop must be retted, a process by which the
"glue" [pectin] that holds the fibers and hurds together is broken
down. This can be done by simply leaving the hemp stalks lying in the field for
4-5 weeks while mother nature naturally decomposes the pectin, but new retting
technologies produce better quality and more uniform fibers in less time.
Because industrial hemp has been grown primarily in moderate climates, most of
the available seeds are bred with those climactic conditions in mind. A few
low-THC and fiber-rich variety, suited to a slightly warmer climate, are being
developed in Hungary under the name of Kompolti. It is well known that high-THC
marijuana grows well in subtropical climates, but more breeding to minimize THC
content and maximize fiber productivity in subtropical climates may be
necessary.
POPULAR MISCONCEPTIONS REGARDING. THE CULTIVATION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP
In the U.S. the major popular misconceptions about growing industrial hemp,
typically voiced by law enforcement agencies, relate to the THC content of the
plant.
Misconception #1: "Any plant with a 0.5-2.0% THC content can induce
intoxication."
The answer to this argument is fully developed in a scientific article [written
in German], authored by three individuals--two medical doctors and one Ph.D.
[Michael Karus, Franjo Grotenhermen, and Helmut Schaaf "Potential for
misuse of industrial hemp as a drug," in Bioresource Hemp Reader, April
1994]. The article draws on over thirty scientific studies on the effects of the
THC substance when smoked. Because smoking produces a greater effect than oral
ingestion, the results of these studies are not negated by situations when THC
is ingested orally. Below is a summary of two main points made-in the article:
Point 1: There is no linear relationship between dosage and effect. Smoking two
hemp cigarettes, whatever the THC content, does not double the effect of one
cigarette. This means that industrial hemp with a THC content of less than 0.3%
does not produce a psycho-active effect even when consumed in large quantities.
Research results consistently show 5-10 mg THC to be the minimal amount to have
any measurable effect. This
[10]
amount, though measurable, is not yet perceptible by the smoker. In order to
achieve the "desired" effect, the smoker needs 15-25 mg, while 30-35
mg would produce a very strong "high." Since studies also show that
the effect depends on the THC being inhaled in a short period of time, the
amounts for minimal and desired effectiveness presuppose inhalation within a
very short time span.
A marijuana cigarette may be smoked as pure marijuana or mixed with tobacco. The
typical cigarette weighs 800-900 mg and is smoked in about 6 [if fast] to 18 [if
slow] minutes. The THC in the brain becomes traceable 14 seconds after first
inhaling the substance. THC content in the blood plasma reaches a peak after
about 3 to 8 minutes during the smoking process, and then falls rapidly again,
even with continued smoking. The maximum euphoric effect is reached in 20-30
minutes. and occurs after the THC plasma peak. The effect stays for about 3
hours.
Using these figures, an average 800-900 mg cigarette made from 0.3% THC
industrial hemp contains 2.4 to 2.7 mg of THC, which means that a cigarette made
from industrial hemp does not achieve the minimal standard [5-10 mg] and is far
less than the "desirable" standard [15-25 mg].
After feeling no effects from a low THC cigarette, it is unlikely that smokers
would continue smoking this "brand." But even if they did, the effect
of THC on the body would not be cumulative.
Point 2: CBD as an antidote. In addition to THC, hemp also contains a substance
called cannabidiol [CBD] which functions as an antidote to THC. A CBD:THC
proportion of 2:1 largely suppresses THC's psychoactive effects. While all
cannabis contains both substances, industrial hemp is low in THC [typically
0.06-0.3%] and high in CBD [>0.5%], accounting for a CBD:THC proportion of
over 5: 1.
Marijuana, on the other hand, is high in THC and low in CBD [<0.5%]. A
chemical analysis of about 100 hemp varieties found about 40 non-drug varieties
with THC:CBD proportions smaller than 1:5. In contrast. the eight drug varieties
in the study had large THC:CBD proportions ranging from 2.3:1 .to 7.4: 1.
The significance of these numbers lies in the fact that industrial hemp, even if
it were to induce a "high" [which it does not] comes along with an
inbuilt countereffect: CBD. [An interesting side note: Low-THC high CBD hemp
cigarettes have been successfully used to help chronic marijuana smokers shed
their addiction.]
Misconception #2: "The effort to legalize hemp is a ruse to legalize the
drug."
There is an increase in the number of groups, companies and individuals who are
supporting the cultivation of industrial hemp. In January 1996, the American
Farm Bureau Federation, representing 4.6 million members, endorsed industrial
hemp by stating: "We recommend that American Farm Bureau Federation
encourage research into the viability and economic potential of industrial hemp
production in the United States. We further recommend that such research
includes planting test plots in the United States using modern agricultural
techniques." The Colorado and Kentucky farm bureaus, along with other
farming associations, are also in support, while environmental groups see hemp
as an alternative for trees for paper.
Companies such as International Paper, Masonite, and Inland Container
Corporation have expressed an interest in hemp as an alternative fiber source.
The International Paper Company (IP), which has 72,000 employees and annual
revenues of $513 billion, sent four representatives to participate in the
founding session of the North American Industrial Hemp Council in Minneapolis
[October 1995]. Half a year earlier [March 1995], the Bioresource Hemp
Symposium, the largest-ever such meeting and trade show was held in Frankfurt,
Germany. Two hundred and forty participants from 20 countries attended,
predominantly researchers including scientists, engineers, and developers of
hemp-based products.
Influential political leaders have gone on record in support of industrial hemp
cultivation. Canada's Health Minister Diane Marleau called hemp "an
excellent commercial and industrial type of crop" with "a great deal
of potential." In Germany, Health Minister Horst Seehofer supported lifting
the ban on hemp cultivation, saying "we now have strains of hemp which
contain such small amounts of the drug THC that they cannot be used for drug
production. The principal argument against a continuing ban on hemp cultivation
is therefore no longer valid."
Additional evidence that the current movement pushing for legal hemp cultivation
is not tied to marijuana advocates lies in the fact the fact that those
countries which have legalized industrial hemp have not changed their drug and
marijuana laws.
Misconception #3: "Legally cultivated hemp fields will be used to
camouflage marijuana patches."
Fields of industrial hemp are ill suited to serve as cover-up for marijuana
patches. Industrial hemp is planted about 1-3 inches apart in order to produce
long stalks with a minimum of branching. The density means that it is impossible
to enter a field without leaving a noticeable trail. In addition, low-THC male
industrial hemp pollen destroys the value of any nearby female marijuana plants.
The THC content in marijuana is highest in the flower but drops sharply with
pollination. For this reason marijuana growers eliminate their male plants in
order to prevent pollination. Thus, they would be highly unlikely to chose
industrial hemp as a cover crop. Another factor is that male hemp plants die
earlier than their female counterparts, which means that hemp, unless grown for
seed.,is harvested before the female plant flowers and produces seeds.
Misconception #4: "There is no satisfactory licensing system to permit
hemp production."
Licensing systems have been developed in Europe, Australia and Canada and are
written into legislation proposed to U.S. legislatures.
The control system in the U.K., where hemp is grown under licenses from the Home
Office, has generally worked well. In 1993 there were a few problems with plants
being stolen from some industrial hemp fields by people looking for a drug
source. By 1995, however. potential drug users appear to have gotten the message
that industrial hemp serves them no purpose and have left hemp fields alone.
The hemp bills that were introduced in Colorado and Vermont 1996 both contained
detailed licensing provisions. The Vermont bill [H. 783] requires all hemp
growers to obtain a state and a federal license. The state license will be valid
for 24 months and not transferable. In order to receive it the applicants must:
a. hold a license from the U.S. DEA;
b. be in compliance with all federal and state laws;
c. submit a $2,000 irrevocable letter of credit or surety bond;
d. obtain all seeds in compliance with the act;
e. demonstrate that all parts not used will be destroyed or recycled; and
f. maintain good record keeping.
The Colorado bill would have required each hemp grower to comply with all
applicable federal laws and to register with a state registered hemp producing
association that has bylaws and procedures to adequately control production. The
bill also required the association to provide evidence that:
a. it registers only serious farmers (shown by filing evidence of financial
responsibility, through savings accounts or irrevocable letter of credit or
surety bond of $2,000, for use of any person suffering loss or in case a crop
needs to be destroyed if out of compliance);
b. it controls seeds;
c. it inspects, tests, and has sanctions for members who are repeatedly out of
compliance;
d. it insures that parts (leaves and flowers) not being used are destroyed or
recycled.
Misconception #5: "There is no standard for an acceptable THC
level."
The good news is that there is a standard in place. The bad news is that this
standard is quite arbitrary and not necessarily the best one. The European
Economic Community (EEC) has agreed on certifying only strains of hemp that
contain less than 0.3% THC, as measured in the upper third of the leaf. However,
the way this standard came about had more to do with French economic interests
than with scientific opinions. With a prior- near-monopoly on 0.3% THC hemp
seeds, it was in France's interests to push for this standard within the EEC.
The move was successful and has meant that European hemp growers, wishing to
qualify for EEC subsidies, purchase their seeds from France, creating a
situation of insufficient supplies and high prices.
In the meantime, new hemp varieties are being developed elsewhere. The former
Soviet Union originally set its standard at 0.2%. While Eastern European strains
do not exceed that limit, several are well below 0.2%. One strain of low-THC
hemp grown in the Ukraine, for example, contains as little as 0.06% THC.
Even though evidence shows that industrial hemp and marijuana are not the same,
and even though other law enforcement concerns have been addressed
satisfactorily in other countries, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency continues to
oppose any legislation that would distinguish between industrial hemp and
marijuana.
THE POLITICS OF HEMP
When hemp was first regulated in 1937, Congress did not intend to outlaw the
legitimate hemp industry. At Congressional hearings after the World War II
"Hemp for Victory" campaign, the Deputy Commissioner of the Federal
Bureau of Narcotics [forerunner of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency] said that
marijuana regulations would not have a negative impact on the commercial hemp
industry.
Today, however, the DEA and other law enforcement agencies routinely oppose the
cultivation of industrial hemp, saying that it would "undermine the public
interest" by making marijuana more available. The agencies also oppose any
exploration of the topic at forums and meetings. In 1995, the DEA was deeply
apprehensive about the founding conference of the North American Industrial Hemp
Forum. Prior to the meeting Edwin Sholts, director of Wisconsin's Department of
Agriculture Development and Diversification Program, was contacted by several
DEA representatives who told him the gathering was "a dumb idea." When
Sholts urged them to attend the conference to discuss the issue, they declined.
Regardless of the U.S. DEA's position in the past, government has been known to
change its mind quickly. Five years after banishing the hemp industry in 1937,
the federal government, suddenly in need of fiber for its war effort, changed
its policies and encouraged American farmers to grow industrial hemp. At the
same time the U.S. Department of Agriculture produced a documentary film
"Hemp for Victory," extolling the virtues of the plant.
Canada's equivalent of the U.S. DEA finds that that country's police forces are
"reasonably happy" with their country's legislation regarding the
experimental cultivation of industrial hemp. According to Ross Hossie, Chief of
Canada's International Control and Licensing Division, Canadian police generally
do not consider hemp cultivation a "great idea," but they prefer to
not take an opposing stand during the legislative process. Instead, Hossie says,
they are prepared to wait for the completed legislation and regulations.
Some people have suggested that Congress should rethink the role of the DEA and
place industrial hemp under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture
rather than leave it under the control of the Drug Enforcement Agency. A similar
question of whether to place oversight over hemp cultivation under the
agricultural or health department is under consideration in Germany.
Will it take another national emergency to take action on industrial hemp?
Elected officials do not want to be seen as being soft on crime and they know
that a vote in favor of industrial hemp may be construed in this way. But the
political effectiveness of confusing marijuana and industrial hemp depends on a
public that has a limited understanding of the issue.
In Kentucky public opinion has shifted because of greater awareness. In 1993,
the governor convened a task force to explore the viability of hemp for the
state. However, for reasons unknown, the chairman disbanded his task force
prematurely and issued a hastily assembled report which was not endorsed by many
of the task force members. The net effect of the task force's creation and
demise was that the issue of growing industrial hemp received broad publicity in
the Kentucky's media, in the process educating the state's people about the
difference between hemp and marijuana. As a result, a March 1996 survey found
77% of Kentuckians favor reintroducing industrial hemp in their state.
There is no guarantee for a future of hemp in the U.S. or in Hawaii, but given
hemp's versatility there is a fair chance of success. Legislators, seeking to
minimize the political risk associated with the hemp issue, are looking for
commitments by large and respectable companies interested in investing in the
new industry. That, however, may be putting the cart before the horse. What is
needed first is a better understanding of the issues involved and small scale
experimental cultivation to generate some of the data that businesses would like
to have in hand before committing themselves.
This report was designed to provide some background information and to help
generate a public discussion in Hawaii.
"Why use the forests which were centuries in the making and the
mines which required ages to lay down, if we can get the equivalent of
forest and mineral products in the annual growth of the fields?"
--Henry Ford--
Prepared for: Representative Cynthia Thielen, Minority Floor Leader
By: Gertraude Roth-Li, Minority Research Staff
Date: April 17, 1996
|